As I've worked my way through this list I've been trying to balance out the ones I want to read with the ones which are harder work. Rightly or wrongly, the Russian epics are definitely on my "harder work" list. I've been reading Anna Karenina for a couple of weeks, and am 53% of the way through (one of the benefits of reading on a Kindle is that you always know exactly how far through you are!). I've told a couple of people that I'm reading it and their reaction has been "you'll love it"..."it's a great book".
I'm going to reserve judgement until the end - so far, I'm not convinced, but I have sort of been reading it alongside a Philippa Gregory (picked up entirely on the basis that the cover matches the colours I've just painted my bedroom and therefore it looks pleasing on the bedside table - me, judge a book by its cover? Never!), which is always going to make Anna Karenina feel like harder work. So far, there are some compelling elements but with the move to the countryside, and elaborate descriptions of farming methods, peasantry and pastoralism, I've kind of lost interest. I will pick it up again soon!
In the meantime, given that it is only one week before Christmas, I thought it was time to read A Christmas Carol. I am obviously familiar with the story, but don't think I have read it previously, given that I go to great lengths to avoid Dickens generally. However, I've read it in about an hour this morning, and got to the end - progress on the majority of my previous Dickens attempts! (Nicholas Nickleby, I mean you - 3 attempts and never finished...).
I have to say I enjoyed it - in a way, there's not anything to dislike. The thing I found particularly striking was the creation of atmosphere and visual pictures which, for me, were much more powerful than any film version I've seen. Scrooge's fear and trepidation is much more clearly depicted when described and then partially left to the imagination!
It is, of course, a great story - some comedy, some sadness, and a transformed Scrooge by the end. Definitely deserves its place in this list, and in the standard Christmas feelgood movie/book canon.
And back to Anna Karenina - I suspect I won't finish it in an hour...
Saturday, 18 December 2010
Sunday, 28 November 2010
A Fine Balance - Rohinton Mistry
It's been a while since I last posted - I think I've been intimidated by the massive stack of worthy-looking books waiting for me to read them!
So, after a brief excursion into the land of frivolity (involving Jasper Fforde's newest - Shades of Grey - very good), I returned to the slightly more sensible world of my list.
A Fine Balance is set in India in the mid-70s, in a time of political turmoil, with the unlikely meeting of Dina, a lonely widowed woman, two tailors, living on the edge of destitution, and a student who comes to rent a room from Dina. There is a lot of detail provided on the political and economic landscape, and the novel follows these four characters through the uncertain times.
AFB was nominated for the Booker Prize and is widely acclaimed. But it is such hard work to read. I finished it, but only because I knew I had to in order to write about it! I found it to be overly complex in terms of the "coincidences" which linked the characters together, not particularly believably. The narrative devices used were also quite predictable - the innocents arriving in the city, trusting the people they meet and being let down; the way that each time it seemed as though the plot was about to resolve positively, something dreadful happened; the way that the tailors constantly believed naively in people with authority despite the number of times they had been let down.
It is a clever book, I think, but I couldn't warm to it - as my friend said, "I'll keep it on the shelf to look worthy, but otherwise - pah!". I can't think of a better summary!
So, after a brief excursion into the land of frivolity (involving Jasper Fforde's newest - Shades of Grey - very good), I returned to the slightly more sensible world of my list.
A Fine Balance is set in India in the mid-70s, in a time of political turmoil, with the unlikely meeting of Dina, a lonely widowed woman, two tailors, living on the edge of destitution, and a student who comes to rent a room from Dina. There is a lot of detail provided on the political and economic landscape, and the novel follows these four characters through the uncertain times.
AFB was nominated for the Booker Prize and is widely acclaimed. But it is such hard work to read. I finished it, but only because I knew I had to in order to write about it! I found it to be overly complex in terms of the "coincidences" which linked the characters together, not particularly believably. The narrative devices used were also quite predictable - the innocents arriving in the city, trusting the people they meet and being let down; the way that each time it seemed as though the plot was about to resolve positively, something dreadful happened; the way that the tailors constantly believed naively in people with authority despite the number of times they had been let down.
It is a clever book, I think, but I couldn't warm to it - as my friend said, "I'll keep it on the shelf to look worthy, but otherwise - pah!". I can't think of a better summary!
Saturday, 30 October 2010
Lord of the Flies
Lord of the Flies is another of those books that everyone else seems to have read at school. It is an extraordinarily powerful book, and I find it slightly depressing to have spent a whole academic year studying As You Like It, and to have studied Silas Marner TWICE...when we could have been reading Lord of the Flies. Ah well - I suppose I get to read it now with full enjoyment, rather than having to pick apart the symbolism in the pig's head on a stick, or the significance of the face paint!
A word of warning - as everyone apart from me seems to have read LOTF, I will be giving away some of the events and ending, so if you haven't read it and might, look away now.
The power of LOTF, I think, lies in the portrayal of the transition from an orderly "British" society to a savage society with its own set of rules and behaviours. When the group finds themselves stranded on the island, they initially attempt to create a culture which mirrors that they have seen at home - what would an adult do if they were here? Intentions are good - we will build shelters, keep a fire going, and one group will find food for the rest. However, intentions are not strong enough to keep the boys from doing, basically, whatever they like - the battle around the fire becomes a central theme of the book, and acts as a symbol of the decline of authority and ordered society.
I was really affected by the examination of tribal behaviour in this novel. There is evidence of it at the start, in that many of the boys in Jack's choir/hunting troupe never exist as individuals with names, but just as a group of boys in black caps, and the "littluns" are never numbered and named. As Jack develops into a more bloodthirsty character, and eventually achieves his first kill for food, he demonstrates that he has the power in this environment, where the ability to provide food has become more important than the ability to think, keep order, and address practicalities. Two separate "camps" emerge - boys are initially tempted across to Jack by the promise of meat and then, following the tribal dance where Simon is identified as the beast and beaten to death, Jack's leadership in violence and ruthlessness makes fear the deciding factor.
Although all of the hunting tribe are involved in the two murders, the nameless/faceless nature of most of them means that the sense of blame is attributed mainly to Jack and Roger, and this very much conflicts with the sense of personal responsibility for ones actions that is a core element of our society. Can the hunters be blamed for their actions? Of course - but when the mask of the facepaint has been applied, and darkness has fallen, the boys no longer operate as individual humans but as a pack of animals, and there is no sense of individual choice there at all.
Piggy is very much an anomaly in this society. His choice of name is significant, given that the only animals on the island which provide sustenance are pigs; as a reasoning voice who is physically unsuited to a life in the wilderness, Piggy is always doomed. He is gradually reduced to, symbolically, an animal to be hunted - severely short-sighted, first one lens of his spectacles is smashed and then the hunters make a midnight raid to steal them in order to light their fire. Piggy is then blind, unable to function - an animal, meaning that Roger is able to roll the rock down the mountain, giving Piggy no chance of escape. Piggy's death represents the final loss of reason, and from this moment Ralph becomes a hunted animal. Crazed by the idea that he needs to remove Ralph (in order to remove the accusation of wrongdoing?), Jack is determined to hunt Ralph down and the island is pretty much destroyed in doing so. Had this battle been followed to its conclusion, Ralph may have been hunted down and killed, but the tribe would also have destroyed their livelihood - the fruit trees and pig habitats were burning as Ralph emerged from the forest and found himself at the feet of a naval officer.
The irony, of course, is that it is Jack's attempt to burn Ralph out of the woods that has created a fire large enough for a ship to see. Suddenly, in front of an adult, they are small boys again, and the battle becomes a game, rather than a matter of life and death. The story ends here, with rescue in sight, leaving open all sorts of questions - how will they reintegrate into British society? Will Jack become a "normal" boy again? Will they ever be punished for the murders of two of their group (not to mention the disappearance of a littlun at the very beginning)?
Golding's pace of writing changes through the novel, changing from a "jolly japes on an island" tone to become ever more urgent, darker, and threatening. I'm sure I haven't written anything here that hasn't been said before - it has a great power to invoke feelings, sensations and moral musings. Spectacular book!
A word of warning - as everyone apart from me seems to have read LOTF, I will be giving away some of the events and ending, so if you haven't read it and might, look away now.
The power of LOTF, I think, lies in the portrayal of the transition from an orderly "British" society to a savage society with its own set of rules and behaviours. When the group finds themselves stranded on the island, they initially attempt to create a culture which mirrors that they have seen at home - what would an adult do if they were here? Intentions are good - we will build shelters, keep a fire going, and one group will find food for the rest. However, intentions are not strong enough to keep the boys from doing, basically, whatever they like - the battle around the fire becomes a central theme of the book, and acts as a symbol of the decline of authority and ordered society.
I was really affected by the examination of tribal behaviour in this novel. There is evidence of it at the start, in that many of the boys in Jack's choir/hunting troupe never exist as individuals with names, but just as a group of boys in black caps, and the "littluns" are never numbered and named. As Jack develops into a more bloodthirsty character, and eventually achieves his first kill for food, he demonstrates that he has the power in this environment, where the ability to provide food has become more important than the ability to think, keep order, and address practicalities. Two separate "camps" emerge - boys are initially tempted across to Jack by the promise of meat and then, following the tribal dance where Simon is identified as the beast and beaten to death, Jack's leadership in violence and ruthlessness makes fear the deciding factor.
Although all of the hunting tribe are involved in the two murders, the nameless/faceless nature of most of them means that the sense of blame is attributed mainly to Jack and Roger, and this very much conflicts with the sense of personal responsibility for ones actions that is a core element of our society. Can the hunters be blamed for their actions? Of course - but when the mask of the facepaint has been applied, and darkness has fallen, the boys no longer operate as individual humans but as a pack of animals, and there is no sense of individual choice there at all.
Piggy is very much an anomaly in this society. His choice of name is significant, given that the only animals on the island which provide sustenance are pigs; as a reasoning voice who is physically unsuited to a life in the wilderness, Piggy is always doomed. He is gradually reduced to, symbolically, an animal to be hunted - severely short-sighted, first one lens of his spectacles is smashed and then the hunters make a midnight raid to steal them in order to light their fire. Piggy is then blind, unable to function - an animal, meaning that Roger is able to roll the rock down the mountain, giving Piggy no chance of escape. Piggy's death represents the final loss of reason, and from this moment Ralph becomes a hunted animal. Crazed by the idea that he needs to remove Ralph (in order to remove the accusation of wrongdoing?), Jack is determined to hunt Ralph down and the island is pretty much destroyed in doing so. Had this battle been followed to its conclusion, Ralph may have been hunted down and killed, but the tribe would also have destroyed their livelihood - the fruit trees and pig habitats were burning as Ralph emerged from the forest and found himself at the feet of a naval officer.
The irony, of course, is that it is Jack's attempt to burn Ralph out of the woods that has created a fire large enough for a ship to see. Suddenly, in front of an adult, they are small boys again, and the battle becomes a game, rather than a matter of life and death. The story ends here, with rescue in sight, leaving open all sorts of questions - how will they reintegrate into British society? Will Jack become a "normal" boy again? Will they ever be punished for the murders of two of their group (not to mention the disappearance of a littlun at the very beginning)?
Golding's pace of writing changes through the novel, changing from a "jolly japes on an island" tone to become ever more urgent, darker, and threatening. I'm sure I haven't written anything here that hasn't been said before - it has a great power to invoke feelings, sensations and moral musings. Spectacular book!
Saturday, 23 October 2010
Holiday reading
One of my favourite things about going on holiday is having time to read- time to pick up a book, get absorbed in it, and keep on reading till the end because there's nothing else you have to do. Fabulous.
This week in Italy, as well as seeing many beautiful mountain views from hilltop towns, and making friends with lots of local cats, and eating some fabulous food, I have read:
A Town Like Alice
The Complete Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
Brave New World
PopCo (Scarlett Thomas)
A Week in December (Sebastian Faulks)
I also started reading Anna Karenina on the plane on the way home but that was always an ambitious ask after 3 hours' sleep!
Let's start with the non-list ones first.
Scarlett Thomas wrote The End of Mr Y, which was my favourite book of 2009. PopCo was published earlier, but shows the same level of creativity and storytelling ability as the End of Mr Y. Alice is a bit of a misfit working for PopCo - the third biggest toy company in the UK. She is reluctantly attending PopCo's annual creativity conference in Devon when she is selected, along with a small group of others, to remain behind indefinitely after the conference and develop a product set which will kickstart a craze amongst the difficult-to-reach teenage girl demographic. The concentrated seminars, designed to help them understand how a toy craze takes hold, makes her increasingly aware of and uncomfortable about the way toys and marketing are designed to manipulate children. This leads into some interesting questions of ethics, globalisation & trade. Alongside this story, Alice is working to crack a code left to her by her grandfather, and also trying to work out who is communicating with her in code within the PopCo centre. The author has clearly done her research and goes into extensive detail on codes, how they work, how they are decoded, different methods etc - but it always complements the story, and doesn't feel like it's just a show and tell of how much she has learned! There are other threads to the story too, and the whole thing weaves together to create a gripping, intelligent and frequently surprising work of fiction. I absolutely loved it, and couldn't put it down.
Secondly, Sebastian Faulks. I have mixed feelings about this one. Faulks' earlier work, particularly Birdsong/Charlotte Grey/Girl at the Lion d'Or, is fantastic, and they are some of my favourite books. However, more recently I've found him much harder to read - Human Traces was just too academic, and I struggled to engage with Engleby. So, I started A Week in December without massive expectations. It's set in 2007 in the context of the banking meltdown, and follows characters ranging from a hedge fund trader to a tube train driver. It's pretty readable but I don't think Faulks' modern style displays him at his best - the dialogue is a bit cliched and stilted. It might be that the event is too much in recent memory to have fiction written about it and to create a sense of originality. So, if you are a Faulks fan, I'd probably recommend reading it, but it isn't amazing.
Sherlock Holmes was the first book I read on the Kindle. It proved that the Kindle is very much a viable medium for reading, and I didn't really notice too much of a difference from reading a book. Well, that's not strictly true I guess, but it is easy to read on, doesn't strain the eyes, and it's actually quite nice that you can just switch it off, and on again, and it is in the same place - no need for a bookmark (lazy reader...!). Sherlock Holmes is, of course, great. Very readable, each case is a distinct story in itself, and each time the resolution is one which seems so simple, but beyond the capability of me as a reader to work it out! It definitely deserves its place within the top 100 list - I enjoyed it very much.
Brave New World is chilling, and creates a convincing image of the new society where babies are grown to fit the genetic characteristics required for the role they are due to play, and a caste system is created according to physical and intellectual ability - but this doesn't matter as all humans are conditioned from birth to be happy with their lot & capacity. When the striving for a "better" life is removed, and the individual does not feel that they should be capable of more than "just" working in a factory, for example, everyone is happy. And, if they are not happy, "soma" is provided, a drug which can be taken to numb emotional disappointments and distress, so that the unhappiness never truly exists, and passes by the time the soma wears off.Bernard is a member of the highest caste but doesn't truly fit in, and he is already dissatisfied with life, reluctant to take soma "holidays", and wishing for a lasting relationship with one woman rather than the now socially acceptable "everyone belongs to everyone". He then visits the New Mexico Reservation, and meets a woman who was cast out of acceptable society to bring up her son. The brave new world, when viewed through the eyes of John "the Savage", who is essentially viewing the world with the morals of Huxley's period of writing, does not seem as perfect as individuals are conditioned to believe. This is a fantastically constructed world, and does deserve its reputation, but it doesn't quite have the strength of 1984 - the characters are less engaging, and the writing is more distant. That's not necessarily to say that 1984 is better - Brave New World goes further in terms of the way that society has developed, and the way that this is maintained - but I did enjoy reading it more.
And finally, A Town Called Alice. This is one of my mother's favourite books, and I believe one of my Grandad's favourite books too. I can't believe I haven't read it before. It centres around Jean Paget, who is a prisoner of war in Malaya and is forced to walk hundreds of miles, in a ragtaggle group of women and children, after they are captured - there is no prisoner of war camp to put them into, and so the Japanese keep them on the move. Jean takes the lead and proves herself to be "a damned fine girl". Following the war, she inherits a large sum of money and goes out to Malaya to build a well for the village where she spent 3 years towards the end of the war. There, she finds out that Joe, an Australian that she met during the war, was not killed as she supposed, and decides to go to Australia to find him. The second part of the novel is Jean making sense of Australian society, and deciding to make a difference. This is a really uplifting work, due to the strength of Jean's character, her ability to achieve anything in any situation, whilst being really an ordinary girl. It is also a love story. And it is beautifully written. I think it's going onto my list of favourites now too!
Onto Anna Karenina next, I think...
Sunday, 10 October 2010
Of Mice and Men (and major book acquisition!)
I've just finished Of Mice and Men -another Steinbeck. Most people read this at school, and I can't quite work out why we didn't. I know that other classes did, as I was vaguely familiar with the story from having seen bits of creative writing based on OMAM on the classroom wall, but my English teacher clearly decided that our group was destined for other things!
So - the cultural background to OMAM is very similar to the Grapes of Wrath, in that George and Lennie are labourers looking for work, with no particular geographical base, ready to pick up and move on. The novel opens as they are heading for their next job.
For those who are not familiar with OMAM, Lennie is a strong giant of a man, who is intellectually limited - his understanding of the world is childlike, coupled with unfeasible strength which he is unable to control when he is scared - a recipe for disaster. George is smaller but cleverer, and has taken it upon himself to care for Lennie. Lennie, unfortunately, continually does "bad things" but never deliberately or maliciously.
They share a dream - to own their own piece of land, just enough to get by, where Lennie will be allowed to look after the rabbits. Realistically, this is never going to happen until they meet Candy, who has saved some money in anticipation of not being able to work, and offers it to George as long as he can live with them on the land, and be as useful as they can. Suddenly there is an exciting future...but Lennie's next "bad thing" puts that at risk.
I don't want to give any more detail for fear of spoiling the ending. Following Lennie's actions, George is left with a very difficult choice and I think, in the end, makes the decision that is best for Lennie. You may choose to disagree with me once you know what that is. However, there is some ambiguity around George's motivations - is he trying to do what is best for Lennie, or has Lennie pushed him too far by endangering George's prospects of achieving his lifelong dream?
It's a pretty quick read, and very accessible - good choice for a GCSE syllabus. It is an interesting insight into that world, and also into the way that ambition and desperation overcome the "natural" human instinct. I'm not sure I'd be particularly excited to read it again, and I'm not sure I'd include it on a list such as this, but it was a perfectly acceptable way of passing a couple of hours!
In other news, it was my birthday a week or so ago, and I was fortunate enough to receive about 15 new books, mainly courtesy of my brother making generous use of an Amazon wish list... This is very exciting - due to the speed at which I read, I very rarely have a queue of new books awaiting my attention. So, I am looking forward to getting into those. I also received a Kindle (e-reader) so that I can theoretically go on holiday without using 50% of my luggage allowance on books. So far, I'm really pleased with it - it's a good size and weight, and pretty easy on the eye as far as the reading experience goes. I'm going to be reading the complete Sherlock Holmes on this, so that review will also look at how it feels to read a book on the Kindle. I don't really know, so far, whether it will make any difference. Also, holiday coming up soon so expect a gap and then lots of list progress, if all goes to plan.
So - the cultural background to OMAM is very similar to the Grapes of Wrath, in that George and Lennie are labourers looking for work, with no particular geographical base, ready to pick up and move on. The novel opens as they are heading for their next job.
For those who are not familiar with OMAM, Lennie is a strong giant of a man, who is intellectually limited - his understanding of the world is childlike, coupled with unfeasible strength which he is unable to control when he is scared - a recipe for disaster. George is smaller but cleverer, and has taken it upon himself to care for Lennie. Lennie, unfortunately, continually does "bad things" but never deliberately or maliciously.
They share a dream - to own their own piece of land, just enough to get by, where Lennie will be allowed to look after the rabbits. Realistically, this is never going to happen until they meet Candy, who has saved some money in anticipation of not being able to work, and offers it to George as long as he can live with them on the land, and be as useful as they can. Suddenly there is an exciting future...but Lennie's next "bad thing" puts that at risk.
I don't want to give any more detail for fear of spoiling the ending. Following Lennie's actions, George is left with a very difficult choice and I think, in the end, makes the decision that is best for Lennie. You may choose to disagree with me once you know what that is. However, there is some ambiguity around George's motivations - is he trying to do what is best for Lennie, or has Lennie pushed him too far by endangering George's prospects of achieving his lifelong dream?
It's a pretty quick read, and very accessible - good choice for a GCSE syllabus. It is an interesting insight into that world, and also into the way that ambition and desperation overcome the "natural" human instinct. I'm not sure I'd be particularly excited to read it again, and I'm not sure I'd include it on a list such as this, but it was a perfectly acceptable way of passing a couple of hours!
In other news, it was my birthday a week or so ago, and I was fortunate enough to receive about 15 new books, mainly courtesy of my brother making generous use of an Amazon wish list... This is very exciting - due to the speed at which I read, I very rarely have a queue of new books awaiting my attention. So, I am looking forward to getting into those. I also received a Kindle (e-reader) so that I can theoretically go on holiday without using 50% of my luggage allowance on books. So far, I'm really pleased with it - it's a good size and weight, and pretty easy on the eye as far as the reading experience goes. I'm going to be reading the complete Sherlock Holmes on this, so that review will also look at how it feels to read a book on the Kindle. I don't really know, so far, whether it will make any difference. Also, holiday coming up soon so expect a gap and then lots of list progress, if all goes to plan.
Saturday, 25 September 2010
Possession
Wow.
The next book on the list was Possession, by A.S. Byatt. I'd never heard of it before, but it apparently won the Booker Prize in 1990.
This book is an amazing piece of work.
A struggling academic, studying a 19th century poet, (Randolph Henry Ash) discovers some drafts of a letter to an unknown woman written by the poet. Ash was previously thought to be happily married, and nothing is known of any involvement with a woman other than his wife. Roland is compelled to investigate. When he discovers that Ash met a poet named Christabel La Motte at around the time that the letter was written, he approaches Maud, an expert on La Motte, to help him trace the connection. Roland and Maud then retrace journeys made by the poets, and uncover more previously unknown letters and poems, to discover a grand passion between Ash & La Motte.
The story is told through these letters and poems, as well as the third person narration. I have to confess that I skipped most of the poems; this probably means that I've missed some of the literary significance of the novel (doing a quick search, it seems that Ash is thought to be based on Robert Browning and La Motte on Emily Dickinson, but I have to say that this passed me by). The early letters between the poets were also hard work as they were literary discussions in relation to their craft of writing. I can appreciate that these elements of Possession are well-written, intelligent, essential to the story...but I didn't actually want to read them.
However, it was worth persevering. The relationship that is uncovered between Ash & La Motte is beautifully realised. Following a chance meeting and then correspondence, they fall in love, passionately and with a compulsion that leaps out of the pages. Ash is known, however, to have remained married to the same woman for the rest of his life, and the diaries and letters that are officially on record have no indication of unhappiness or disruption in their marriage. This raises some questions about the nature and potential duality of love - is it possible to fall in love with a second person without this reducing the love you feel for the first? The reader is given an insight into the relationship which is not given to the academics, and arrives at a good understanding and possibly justification of Ash's love affair - but Roland & Maud will never get to understand this. Part of its power also comes, I think, from the fact that their behaviour is so different to what we have traditionally come to expect from 19th century characters in literature.
The 19th century events take place against a background of academic rivalry - American and English academics vying for understanding, discovery and, above all ownership of the papers. We also see Roland moving from a stagnating relationship and career, with a continuous sense of failure to....something different. I don't want to give away too much of the story, because the dramatic tension is beautifully maintained.
Although it is hard work at times, I would highly recommend reading this. It is beautifully constructed and researched, and I was deeply affected by it. Not so much that I would recommend polygamy as a way of life, naturally, but the "historical" figures had such depth of feeling and powerful passion that it seemed impossible for them to have made any other choice. The academics, "current time" figures as far as the novel is concerned, paled into insignificance beside them, and it was impossible to make the moral judgement that Ash was wrong to do what he did. I can't work out how to express this well, but there is something in the writing that connected directly into my heart/emotions, rather than me just responding to it intellectually as I do to most fiction. That sounds slightly odd, but I can't think of any other way to put it. If you read it, let me know what you think!
Saturday, 11 September 2010
Winnie-the-Pooh
I didn't think I had read Winnie-the-Pooh before but I was only one chapter in when I realised that I had, either in one go or in separate stories. However, I read all the way through to the end anyway - couldn't resist it. W-t-P is such a nice book. It has a genuine innocence, and the characters are nicely realised without too much description of them. There isn't a massive amount to say about it...but W-t-P definitely deserves its position as one of the most enduring and well-loved childrens' books of all time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)